Atlanta Employment Attorneys Blog

How to Decide Whether a Worker Should (or Should Not) Be Included in a Tip Pool

October 10, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

One of the thorniest areas of Fair Labor Standards Act law concerns tipped employees. Disputes involving tipped workers are among the most frequent to arise. One area where difficulties may emerge is when an employer establishes a mandatory tip pool. While some workers, like servers, might obviously be included in a tip pool, other employees’ jobs might make their status less clear. If you are an employee or an employer with a tip pooling question, be sure you get the knowledgeable information you need by speaking to a knowledgeable Atlanta wage and hour lawyer.

A recent Wage and Hour Division (WHD) opinion letter is a reminder that, when it comes to mandatory tip pools, the key is not just what task an employee does, but the context in which they perform it.

The employer was a seafood restaurant that offered freshly shucked oysters from an oyster bar. At this restaurant, the employer stationed the oyster shuckers behind the eatery’s bar alongside its bartenders, where they engaged “with customers by sharing and detailing oyster offerings, making suggestions regarding the oyster offerings, and fielding other questions about the different options, while preparing the oysters for and in front of the customers.”

The Impact New Circuit Court Rulings May Have on the Process of Certifying FLSA Collective Actions

September 30, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

The Fair Labor Standards Act does not authorize class actions brought by groups of plaintiffs. Instead, the FLSA has a unique procedure under which groups of employees may join in civil litigation — the collective action. One of the critical crossroads in a potential collective action is the juncture where the judge decides whether or not to issue notice of the suit to similarly situated employees (and thereby give them the option to join the suit). With several new federal appeals court decisions in recent months and years, the standard for when to authorize notice is evolving. If you have questions about your FLSA matter and the viability of collective status, you should get in touch with an Atlanta collective action lawyer.

One of the more recent developments in this area occurred in the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in August.

The employee in that case, M.R., was a woman in her 50s who worked in a sales capacity for an Indiana-headquartered pharmaceutical company. When the employer allegedly passed her over for a managerial role (in favor of a much younger, less experienced candidate), the woman launched an age discrimination lawsuit. Specifically, she contended that her rejection was part of the employer’s pattern of passing over older candidates in favor of promoting younger, less qualified ones.

How an Employer’s Refusal to Rehire a Former Employee May Constitute FMLA Retaliation

September 24, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

A lumber mill worker’s recent success in federal court represents a noteworthy outcome for multiple reasons. For the worker, it recognizes that an employer may be liable for retaliation under the Family and Medical Leave Act, both by terminating the worker and by subsequently refusing to rehire them. On the employer side, it demonstrates just how crucial it is to document carefully why your business makes the decisions it does regarding hiring, firing, and rehiring, and how this is even more critical if your business is dealing with a worker who has engaged in statutorily protected activities in the past. Whether you are a worker or an employer, an experienced Atlanta FMLA retaliation lawyer can provide essential answers to questions you have about this issue.

The worker, E.B., worked for two years, from 2015 to 2017. According to the employee’s lawsuit, he “worked in every department … without complaint or discipline.” The employer allegedly fired him in December 2017 after he requested and took FMLA leave to care for his disabled wife.

E.B. sued for FMLA retaliation in 2019. K.B., a coworker at the mill, submitted a sworn statement in support of E.B. as part of that lawsuit.

Free Speech Rights in the Wake of the Charlie Kirk Assassination

September 18, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

The killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk has triggered strong reactions from both supporters and critics alike. However, the reaction of employers has not been even-handed. Employees perceived as making negative comments about the shooting have faced intense blowback; some have even lost their jobs. Meanwhile, those celebrating Mr. Kirk’s controversial positions have faced no consequences at all. The disciplining of employees who appear not to support Kirk may lead one to wonder: Can employers legally discipline employees for their personal opinions or social media posts? While some may have that ability, others may have crossed a constitutional line and engaged in an impermissible violation of the employee’s free speech rights, especially if the employer is a public one. If you or someone you know is caught up in the controversy, an experienced Atlanta employment lawyer can provide you, as a public employee, with crucial advice and advocacy to ensure your First Amendment rights are protected.

Private employers are generally not restricted by the First Amendment. Thus, the majority of those employed by private employers have no free speech protections at work. These workers remain employed only as long as the employer wants them to be, and the employer can fire them for any reason or no reason at all, including its disapproval of their online or social media activity.

Public employees, on the other hand, enjoy First Amendment protections. These employees include public school teachers. Adam Goldstein, senior vice president of strategic initiatives at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, a free speech advocacy organization, told WRAL in Raleigh, N.C., that, in general, “a public school teacher in their own time, posting on their social media that’s their own personal account about things that aren’t related to school, is going to be protected by the First Amendment.”

What Does (and Does Not) Make a Workplace Complaint a ‘Protected Activity’ Under Title VII Retaliation Law

September 10, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

Here in Georgia, workers who experience discrimination based on specific statutorily defined characteristics, like, for example, age and sexual orientation, are protected by federal law. If you are a worker who has experienced this kind of discrimination at work (or are an employer facing such an allegation), it pays to retain an experienced Atlanta employment discrimination lawyer to handle your case. The law requires a worker to clear certain legal hurdles if his case is to defeat employer motions (like a motion to dismiss or motion for summary judgment). A skilled advocate can be instrumental in ensuring that your pleadings are in order, whether you are the worker or the employer.

A recent workplace discrimination case from southwest Georgia illustrates the risks that a worker assumes when proceeding without counsel.

B.H., the employee, worked as a career development coordinator at a public university in Albany, Georgia. The coordinator was 40 years old, gay, and Black, and his “protected characteristics” allegedly placed a discriminatory target on him.

Employer Termination Decisions, Employee Invocation of FMLA Rights, and the Importance of Timing in Interference and Retaliation Cases

August 29, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

Employers must tread carefully when disciplining (or firing) workers who have sought to invoke their Family and Medical Leave Act rights. Employers may be vulnerable to liability for FMLA interference or retaliation if they cannot demonstrate that the employee’s exercise of FMLA played no role in the decision-making that yielded the adverse action. On the other hand, employers who have clear evidence that FMLA was not a factor (such as an employer that made an internal decision to punish or fire a worker before the employee requested FMLA leave) need not fear proceeding with their intended adverse action. Whether you are an employer or an employee, the keys often lie with carefully documenting everything and promptly retaining a skilled Atlanta FMLA lawyer.

An FMLA case from here in Metro Atlanta is a good illustration.

The employer was an Alpharetta-based business marketing firm. The employee was one of its project managers. About five years into her tenure, the project manager’s new supervisor placed her on a Performance Improvement Plan (which is a type of formal discipline that establishes a deadline for an employee to improve deficiencies in their work).

Bonuses, Regular Rates of Pay, and Ensuring FLSA Compliance When Calculating Overtime Compensation

August 25, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

One area of wage-and-hour law where employers can easily run afoul of the Fair Labor Standards Act is overtime pay… or, more specifically, underpayment of overtime. If an employer does not correctly assess the forms of compensation that go into calculating a worker’s regular rate of pay, then that employer runs the risk of underpaying the worker when they earn overtime compensation. An experienced Atlanta wage and hour lawyer can help provide you with reliable answers to the overtime compensation questions you have.

A federal investigation of a North Georgia plastic fabrication company revealed one place where employers can go wrong: bonuses.

The U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division investigated a Gainesville-area employer whose records showed that more than 700 workers received overtime compensation sums that were less than what they were entitled to.

Scenarios Where Employers May Fire or Demote Workers Who Are Taking FMLA Leave

August 18, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

The Family and Medical Leave Act provides strong protections for workers who need leave. These include things like being reinstated to the same or a similar position after returning from leave. As with most legal concepts, this protection is not absolute. The law carves out exceptions, such as when the employer has evidence that it would have demoted or fired the worker even if they had never gone on FMLA leave. Whether you are a worker or an employer, you should talk to an experienced Atlanta FMLA lawyer if you have questions.

An FMLA case from nearby Douglas County shows how this concept works and how an employer can use it successfully.

E.P., the employee, was a deputy chief with the county fire department. Soon after he started, the State of Georgia altered its requirements for firefighter certification, requiring both hazardous materials (hazmat) awareness training and hazmat operations training.

A Middle Georgia Employer Successfully Defeats Call Center Workers’ Request to Create a FLSA Collective Action

August 11, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

A Fair Labor Standards Act collective action can be a powerful tool for workers. Similarly, employers may find it preferable to fight an individual action as opposed to a collective lawsuit. Whether you are a worker or an employer, it is beneficial to understand the standards the law erects for certifying FLSA collective actions and the factors that may help win (or defeat) certification. When taking on such a lawsuit, it is well worth your while to consult an experienced Atlanta collective action lawyer for advice about your situation.

The FLSA does not have class actions; it permits collective actions. Unlike other class actions, where all covered individuals are deemed a part of the class unless they opt out, FLSA collective actions work differently. In a collective action, putative members must affirmatively opt in, rather than having to opt out.

One of the most fundamental aspects of collective actions is similarity among the proposed members. In a nearby unpaid hours case involving a call center, that similarity was lacking, according to the Middle District of Georgia.

A Staffing Firm Must Pay $9 Million for Misclassifying Its 1,100 Nurses as Independent Contractors

July 31, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

One of the more substantial mistakes a business can make is to misclassify employees as independent contractors. An employee whose employer erroneously labels them as an independent contractor may be denied health care insurance coverage, family leave, and unemployment protection. They may also be deprived of the right to receive a minimum wage and overtime compensation. The employer that makes this mistake runs the risk of paying thousands — or millions — in a civil action. In short, both employers and employees have reasons to want to “get it right” when it comes to correct classification, and getting advice from a knowledgeable Atlanta wage and hour lawyer can be crucial to achieving this objective.

A federal case that started in Virginia provides an example of how costly misclassification can be. The employer was a Virginia-based medical staffing company that provided nurses to healthcare facilities in that state and the surrounding areas. The workers were a group of nurses, nurse practitioners, and nursing assistants.

To receive assignments from the company, the entity required candidates to fill out an “application for employment.” That document identified the nurse as an “employee” and the company as the “employer.” If the nurse successfully completed the employment application process, they ultimately signed an “independent contractor agreement,” which included a 12-month non-compete clause.