Wage & Hour

More About the Pleading Necessities When Seeking a Default Judgment in a FLSA Lawsuit

December 23, 2024 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

As this blog discussed last week, most employers will vigorously litigate a lawsuit where an employee alleges a Fair Labor Standards Act violation. In the rare situations where the employer does not, something called a “default judgment” may be available to the worker. Even though you are not litigating against an actively participating defense, that does not mean success is automatic. You must clear challenging hurdles, which is why retaining a highly skilled Atlanta wage-and-hour lawyer is vital to getting the compensation you deserve.

Last week, we covered jurisdiction and venue issues in the case of a convenience store manager seeking payment for unpaid overtime. Establishing those, which the manager did, is not the only thing you must demonstrate for a judge to grant you a default judgment. You must also demonstrate several more elements specific to FLSA law. Specifically, you must show that you and the employer had an employee-employer relationship and are “covered” by the FLSA.

The woman’s allegation laid out employment as a non-exempt hourly employee at the convenience store from March 2021 to August 2022. Those assertions satisfied the court that the manager had pled an employee-employer relationship.

Default Judgments and FLSA Lawsuits in Federal Court

December 18, 2024 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

An employer will usually vigorously litigate a lawsuit alleging that it violated the Fair Labor Standards Act. Sometimes, though, the employer will not act. The deadline for filing passed with no answer… no other pleadings… nothing. When that happens in an unpaid overtime lawsuit, the worker may pursue something called a “default judgment.” Viewing this circumstance as the equivalent of an “uncontested layup” in basketball can be tempting. However, just as a basketball player does not automatically get two points when he/she has an uncontested layup opportunity, a worker does not automatically get a judgment in his/her favor solely because the employer defaulted. There are ways to mess up, even when the other side fails to contest. Having a highly skilled Atlanta wage-and-hour lawyer on your side is one way to avoid falling victim to these procedural hurdles.

For example, we can look at a recent unpaid overtime case involving a convenience store manager who was a non-exempt employee.

One of the keys to turning a motion for default judgment into an actual default judgment is making sure your court pleadings are complete and sufficiently specific. In an unpaid overtime case, that means establishing, among other things, personal jurisdiction, subject matter jurisdiction, and venue.

A Federal Appeals Court Has Taken Down the 80/20/30 Rule for Applying the Tip Credit

December 10, 2024 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

Last month, an important federal court ruling wiped out a new U.S. Department of Labor Rule expanding salaried employees’ eligibility for overtime compensation by narrowing employers’ ability to apply certain exemptions. A few months earlier, a different federal court ruling from Texas also significantly impacted wage and hour law, but on a different set of employees. This ruling targeted a 2021 DOL rule regarding the tip credit. These rulings are crucial reminders that, especially under the current legal landscape, the rules and standards of wage and hour law are prone to change. With that in mind, you must work with a knowledgeable Atlanta wage and hour lawyer to ensure that your pay practices are compliant with (or taking advantage of) all the latest developments in the law.

The tip credit is the mechanism that allows employers to pay tipped workers a base hourly wage of as little as $2.13 per hour so long as the tipped worker’s base wage plus tips equals or exceeds $7.25 per hour. In 2021, the Labor Department established a rule saying that an employer could only apply the tip credit to workers if they spent 80% (or more) of their time doing tip-producing work (like serving tables in a restaurant, for example.)

The rule also established that these workers could spend no more than 20% of their time doing “directly supporting” work. (That latter category includes things like cleaning and setting tables or making coffee and tea.) An additional part of the rule said that workers could spend no more than 30 consecutive minutes doing this supporting work, or else the employer could not use the credit.

Employers’ Recordkeeping Obligations Under the FLSA and the Dangers of Not Making Court-Ordered Pay Record Disclosures

November 29, 2024 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

Under the terms of the Fair Labor Standards Act, employers have numerous obligations. In addition to paying covered workers a minimum wage and time-and-a-half overtime compensation, employers also have an obligation to keep to an array of records related to their workers, the time they worked, and the compensation they received. Failing to keep these records can be very damaging to an employer. For answers to questions about the FLSA’s recordkeeping requirement, get advice from an experienced Atlanta wage-and-hour lawyer.

The FLSA recordkeeping troubles of a steel mill in South Alabama began after a group of its employees discovered what they believed to be a “series of wage-and-hour violations.” Those alleged transgressions included not paying the workers for all the hours they worked and shorting them on overtime compensation.

The case was a complicated matter, implicating things like multiple regular rates of pay that “changed based on the shift worked, the way time was rounded, the level of work, and the company’s monthly incentive plan.” (The employees’ overtime claims hinged, in part, on whether or not the employer assigned the correct regular rate to all the employees’ hours.)

How Procedural Requirements May Help – or Doom – Your Unpaid Overtime Case in Georgia

October 31, 2024 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

Claiming “time of the essence” is a common marketing technique. Sellers use deadlines to create a sense of urgency and motivate buyers to act. In sales, a deadline may not be real; it may be merely an artificial tool to pique the customer’s emotions. In law, time really is of the essence in many settings, including matters involving Fair Labor Standards Act violations. A lawsuit filed after the statutory deadline is vulnerable to a motion to dismiss that will, barring special circumstances, likely end the case with no further litigation, no trial, and no award of damages. Whether you are a worker seeking to ensure a timely filing or an employer seeking to terminate a case that was filed too late, obtaining representation from an experienced Atlanta wage and hour lawyer can be an essential step en route to success.

Absent special circumstances, workers pursuing FLSA claims generally must file within either two or three years. If the worker has presented a willful violation of the law, then the law allows three years to bring that case. If the violation is not an allegedly willful one, the worker has only two years in which to sue. If you are the party seeking relief, filing after the limitations period has elapsed is potentially catastrophic to your case. Conversely, a filing that was outside the limitations period can be a huge boon if you are an employer facing an FLSA claim. In each scenario, a motion to dismiss can terminate the case right away.

A federal unpaid overtime case from Miami is a good illustration. Although not taking place in Georgia, the Miami parties were subject to the same set of requirements under the federal rules as parties to a federal lawsuit in Georgia would face, including satisfying the statute of limitations.

What to Do (and Avoid Doing) to Minimize Your Risk of Liability Exposure for Illegal Retaliation

October 25, 2024 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

Decisions made on impulse or driven by emotions often make bad situations worse. As an employer, dealing with your alleged Fair Labor Standards Act violation the wrong way can significantly expand the legal liability you may face. A minimum wage or unpaid overtime violation is one thing; a minimum wage or unpaid overtime violation plus a violation of the law against retaliation is unequivocally worse. Knowing what to do (and, often, what not to do) when faced with a FLSA claim is crucial. An experienced Atlanta wage and hour lawyer can help you mitigate your existing liability exposure, and avoid unnecessary additional forms of exposure, as well.

Some missteps are born of a fierce urge to tell “your side of the story.” While sometimes understandable, this can lead to serious trouble.

Take, for example, a recent FLSA retaliation action from New England. The case arose after the president of a Vermont excavation company fired one of his truck drivers following a dispute about overtime pay. The driver complained to the Wage and Hour Division. That agency’s investigation ended with a settlement calling for the employer to compensate the driver for back pay and unlawful discharge.

Breastfeeding Awareness Month Has Ended, But It’s Still the Right Time to Focus on the Requirements of the PUMP Act and the FLSA

October 8, 2024 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

National Breastfeeding Awareness Month may have ended a few weeks ago (August 31) but any time is a good time for employers and employees who are new (or expecting) mothers to familiarize or re-familiarize themselves with the rights and responsibilities that federal and state laws lay out for workers who need to nurse or express milk (a/k/a pump) during the work day. If you have questions about this aspect of the law, a knowledgeable Atlanta wage and hour lawyer is an essential resource for obtaining reliable answers and ensuring compliance.

Some of the federal requirements in this sphere are well-known, such as the obligation to give nursing/pumping moms breaks to breastfeed/express milk and provide those moms with an appropriate space for this activity. (In other words, not a toilet stall in the office’s communal bathroom or a supply room with no lock on the door that coworkers enter frequently.)

Multiple recent federal class action lawsuits against fast-food employers have focused on the right to an appropriate pumping location.

The FLSA’s Pay Practice Rules Regarding Inclement Weather-Related Business Closures

August 12, 2024 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

Compliance with the federal overtime compensation and the minimum wage standards can be affected by many things… even the weather. These wide and varied influences on businesses’ compliance with the Fair Labor Standards Act (and accompanying regulations) serve as a reminder that ensuring compliance is an extensive and multifaceted project. Whether you are an employer seeking to ensure your pay practices are compliant or a worker denied proper compensation, an experienced Atlanta wage and hour lawyer can advise you about your rights and obligations.

Hurricane Debby struck Florida earlier this month as a Category 1 storm but quickly entered Georgia packing tropical storm-force winds and massive volumes of rain. The storm forced schools, government offices, and businesses to close across South Georgia, including Savannah and Brunswick.

In North Georgia, our businesses are more likely to close temporarily because of snow and ice rather than tropical weather, but closures do happen. Employers may reasonably wonder what their pay obligations are under the FLSA when workers are not at work because of weather-related closures.

Lessons About Exempt Versus Non-exempt Classifications from a Recent Call Center Employee Case

July 11, 2024 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

As an employer or an employee, compliance with the Fair Labor Standards Act is important to you. If you are a worker, non-compliance often means denial of the total compensation the law says your employer owes you. As an employer, non-compliance can have numerous damaging and costly consequences. If you have questions about FLSA compliance, including classification and exemption issues, make sure you are getting reliable answers by contacting an experienced Atlanta wage and hour lawyer.

For employers, misclassification is a common basis for FSA violation liability. Errors can occur in the context of employer-versus-independent contractor classifications or exempt-employee-versus-non-exempt-employee determinations. When deeming a worker as an exempt employee, it is important to identify all bases under which that worker may be exempt under the law, as a recent ruling from the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals illustrates.

The unpaid overtime case involved an auto dealership group in West Palm Beach, Florida, and three of its call center employees. The employees, who worked in the dealership’s “business development center,” a separate building next door to the dealership’s auto showroom, spoke to prospective car buyers over the phone to convince them to make appointments to visit the showroom and speak with showroom salespersons.

The Emergence of AI in the Workplace and How AI Can Potentially Contribute to FLSA Violations

June 28, 2024 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

These days, ads for artificial intelligence-related programs and applications seem to be everywhere. AI has the potential to do many beneficial things like making workplaces more efficient and safer. It also has the possibility of negative impacts, including in the area of employment law. The U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division (WHD) recently released a publication warning of ways that AI can lead employers into violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Whether or not they are tied to AI, an experienced Atlanta wage and hour lawyer can provide very human answers to all your questions about FLSA compliance.

The WHD’s recent publication, Field Assistance Bulletin No. 2024-1, looked at ways AI could lead an employer into non-compliance. The first area the division discussed was AI productivity monitors.

Modern AI technology can monitor workers “in real time,” using metrics like website browsing, the number of computer keystrokes or mouse clicks, or eye movements (via webcam,) to ascertain an employee’s activity and productivity levels. While employers may use this technology and these metrics to assess employees’ diligence and productivity, those determinations do not necessarily govern how the law calculates workers’ hours worked.